My basic point is that preventing free immigration requires targeting peaceful individuals with deadly force. There is no other way to prevent what they oppose.
Those advocating such immigration control ought to be willing, in principle, to go down and patrol the Mexican border themselves and employ deadly force against a peaceful individual who wants to come mow my lawn.
So here’s the challenge, will you affirm this?
Yes, in principle I would be willing to personally shoot and kill that peaceful immigrant if that’s what it took to keep him from coming here to mow your lawn.
It takes deadly force to secure the borders. Remove that force and the borders are wide open. And if you advocate closed borders but you’re not willing in principle to employ that force yourself then clearly you are a chickenhawk on immigration.
My parody Lew Rockwell’s Army assumes that you’re not chickenhawks, since chickenhawks are despised at LRC.
So what’s not fair?
So far I have not seen Rockwell, Hoppe, Kinsella or any member of the LRA affirm that they would in principle personally be willing to do what it takes to prevent open immigration.
So who wants to be first out of the chickenhawk coop?