Endarkenment. For Real
I wonder if it would be terribly unseemly of me to just fall down
laughing at the state that California is in. Honest to god...
Anybody who knows me could testify that I don't have a malicious bone in
my body, but another thing about me is that I have a seriously wicked
taste for justice. I sure do love to see the whip crack on anyone
who really deserves it. I guess the thing that gives me pause about
shooting off rockets over what I'm seeing out there right now is the
prospect of sorting out the individuals who deserve it -- whether from
their beliefs or actually involved responsibility -- from those who
wouldn't have any part of it and who know when sausage-fingered mooks
have gummed up the works.
Because of how I generally despise
California culture, though, it's really hard. On my worst days, I
couldn't care less if the whole loopy place just fell right off the edge
of the continent with one giant splash, and some of my worst days have
been in California. So, when I hear all this fretting over how the
lights might start winking out, I tick-off a mental checklist of about a
dozen people I know out there who I would hope could get through it, and
I figure the rest of them should just light up their Rachel Carson
Memorial votive candles and shiver while the rain drives 'em nuts.
All that is easy enough to deal with. What's a lot more menacing is
how the awesome lie of blaming capitalism and "free markets" lumbers on,
now, into its second century with this episode as a landmark. Television
news anchors hawk the lie like parrots. For example, on January 11,
Jennings opened his report with the rapier insight that "the
deregulation of the electric power industry in California is causing one
problem after another," and Rather naturally howled about "mother nature
contribut[ing] a storm to a man-made deregulation disaster." It's
not appalling enough that morons like these don't know anything about
markets in general or particular. No, they're also ignorant of the
facts, or of the meanings of words, or both, any of which is a
remarkable state of affairs for people in their business.
One
might begin analysis of the scene with the assumption that people like
this object to "deregulation" -- taking the word for what it would mean
to people familiar with concepts rendered in plain English. The ways in
which they throw words around might help one to conclude on when they
mean to speak in general terms. If THAT was ever true, and
taken together with objection to "deregulation," then one
would naturally expect them to argue for complete state ownership and
operation of things like power generation plants. On the other hand, and
however, they never really argue for anything, do they? Not out
loud, that is. The wink is as good as the nod to heads talking in
thirty-second code, and so it's a bit much to expect them to come right
out for a Kaliphornia Elektrikwerke.
At the same time, it's
handy enough for them to refer to "deregulation" of electrical power
when the cappuccino machines are in danger for a couple hours at a time.
Someone who had just dropped in to notice all the noise could crank up a
mental picture of a line of gray pinstriped suiters reaching to the
horizon, and ready to disappear in a trampling cloud of dust headed for
the golden shore at the drop of the "deregulation" handkerchief. I'm not
one much for "subtexts," except when people like the heads are
talking in their winking nodding style, and that's when I know 'em
because I hear 'em and see 'em.
Of course, they -- the subtexts
-- are everywhere around this flaming hematoma. Just today, those gray
people uptown, who fit all the news to print, asked the first thing to
flit into their ditzy minds: "Where'd all the money go?" What a story.
It's sternly pointed out that the wholesale energy unit of Houston-based
Reliant Energy knocked off ninety million bucks in the third quarter of
last year "in California alone." Jeez. One can almost see the poor
little tykes breaking open piggy-banks to hand over nickels to the spats
& vests robber barons at the door in order to keep the PlayStation
2's going through the next highest round. One can almost see it, that
is, until one takes a look at Reliant's quarterly stockholder report and
observes an increase of expenses in the wholesale energy unit from $2.9B
to $6.7B in the third quarter of '00 over Q3 '99. I guess stuff like all
those windmills out in West Texas -- the largest single
megawatt-installation in the world -- soaks up a lot of nickels. I sure
hope it pays off. I mean, it's not where I would put my money,
but I'm not the one gouging the poor little tykes of California, so I
guess I get to shut up about it.
"Where did the money go?"
indeed. What would it take to make clear to people who ask such
questions in times like these that the money goes where it's needed? To
me, it's unbelievable that over a century and a half of
industrial life has not been able to render these lessons clearly to
some goddamned dolts. It's what money does. That's in its nature.
It simply is what it is. Like oil through the looking glass, so is the
dough of our lives: going where the going's good when human beings want
it or need it that way, which is universally all the time. It's
unfortunate that Governor Gray Davis can suddenly feel the cold grip of
commerce around his neck -- in the form of the incipient personal
disaster of eventually having to find a real job if he doesn't get out
there and do his best ordained savior act by screaming about
"out-of-state profiteers" -- but that doesn't mean that he can do
anything to alter the immutable ebb and flow of the grease of life.
Now, these matters really are not terribly difficult. In spite of
how dismally the science of economics acquitted itself throughout nearly
all the twentieth century, nothing about what causes these kinds of
horrentia is essentially opaque to ordinary understanding. Henry Hazlitt
-- once hailed by H. L. Mencken as "one of the few economists in human
history who could really write" -- explained things tidily and amply
with his "Economics In One Lesson" of 1946. Governor Davis could save
himself a lot of anguish by sitting down to read ten pages on
"Government Price Fixing," if he were really anguished about
whether the cappuccino machines and PlayStations will keep going. The
thing is: that's not what he's concerned with. Mel Brooks knew the
score: "We must protect our phony-baloney jobs, gentlemen!"
See, Davis has got a seller's market, too. In a world in which I've seen
even "conservative" commentators remarking on "the failure of a state to
provide energy for its citizens," it's no great task to figure out
that people like Davis only have to grab the nearest microphone or
collar a stenographer...er, "reporter," and start hollering
about "the citizens" and they'll come running to join the hue & cry
for whatever he can duct-tape together in the legislature. And, of
course, it's a safe bet that "deregulation" won't be on "the
agenda," to coin a term abominated to ghastly proportions in recent
times.
"Deregulation" is now become the stake to be driven
through the heart of the machine. The air is filled with all kinds of
wailing over something gone terribly wrong, and has been for many
months. In August of last year, Patrick Dorinson of the California
Independent System Operators was already quoted by the Environmental
News Network, moaning, "In 1991, how were we to know there would be such
a surging economy in the year 2000?" I wonder if he meant that if anyone
had known, then the "deregulation" scheme might have allowed buyers and
sellers to negotiate their own contracts instead of forcing everyone to
agree to the same price on any given day in the Power Exchange at
Pasadena, or that utilities might have been permitted to set their own
rates to consumers. I rather doubt all that, but I guess I'm doubting
that anything was "deregulated," too.
It won't do any
good to point out that, for instance, the rise of digital technology
should have been, uhm, "deregulated," in all the same sorts of
ways as the electrical power industry. Taking someone like Dorinson at
his miserable whining word, it's easy for me to sit here after the turn
of the century and point out to him that someone should have seen the
day coming when all those nasty evil Web-server farms should have been
"deregulated" before they sprang up to their present greedy bloated
proportions of about fifteen times the square-foot power requirements of
an average commercial office building. Of course, there were only about
five hundred documents on the entire World Wide Web in the year he
moaned about, but I have to say I find it just hilarious the way the
grease of life wends its way into places where morons can't see, and why
it takes people of real vision to both make that happen and deal with it
when it does.
Now, however, it's happened, and the vampire
hunters are out with the stakes in hand. Senator Diane Feinstein is
working up legislation to cap wholesale electricity prices in eleven
western states, and everybody should bet long on hearing her swearing
righteous doom upon every variety of greed gouging the poor tykes
crouching in the glow of the least humming radiance, anywhere. The
"experiment" of California is a "colossal and dangerous failure"
according to those in the know -- like Governor Davis, for instance --
and officials flock across the land to poke and study the twitching
monster in its terrible throes.
In a way, it's a damned good
thing that authentic Americans are a species dwindling in numbers below
those of panda bears and about fifty-six different kinds of bugs
anymore. That's because their embarrassment at the prospect of East
European-styled blackouts anywhere in their homeland would have been
simply mortifying to behold. Some would say that we can afford it now
that the Soviet Union isn't around to make political hay on such a scene
-- the Cold War is over, you see, and "globalization" means never having
to say you live better than the furthest dirt-scratching savages.
But I can't help it if I'm going to have to laugh my ass off when
it gets down to some dirt-brain standing at a record store counter in
the dark and asking, "How come I can't see where to click on this to
hear a sample?"